SEPWA Glen Mitchell Wheat Harvest 2003 Supported by the Department of Agriculture
Home * About SEPWA * Variety Trials * Contact * Membership * Useful Links * News

Kg/ha; percentage of nearest control Back to Map
Glen Mitchell Wheat Harvest 2003
 
Control

  No Significant Difference
  Significantly Better

  Significantly Worse

 

comments

protein

moisture

hectolitre

screening%

stain

mould

falling numbers

Mitre

 

9.7

13

72.644

1.56%

15

1

62

Ruby

some shedding, less than Shenton more than Mitre control

10.4

13

75.422

1.20%

15

1

62

Wyalkatchem

10.1

13.2

76.462

1.63%

7

1

66

Mitre

 

9.8

12.9

71.972

1.86%

13

1

62

Braewood

 

10

12.7

72.844

1.99%

5

5

63

Sunvale

 

10.6

13

75.082

1.49%

8

1

62

Mitre

 

9.8

12.9

74.222

1.60%

18

 

62

Drysdale

variable growth with change in water availability - bad for waterlogging

10

13.1

77.458

1.27%

24

 

62

Shenton

some shedding

10.1

12.8

73.084

1.38%

16

 

62

Mitre

 

10

12.9

72.89

1.84%

10

3

62

Janz

 

10.5

12.8

75.46

1.04%

21

3

63

Annuello

 

10.3

12.8

75.876

2.01%

8

 

62

Mitre

 

9.9

12.7

74.264

1.30%

18

2

62

Yitpi

 

10.4

13

74.484

1.15%

24

 

128

Bowerbird

"more on the ground than left in the heads!"

10.5

12.7

75.19

1.99%

5

 

63

Mitre

 

9.8

12.2

79.788

2.32%

14

 

62

Giles

 

9.9

12.6

75.174

1.65%

11

3

72

Strezlecki

 

10.4

12.5

73.908

1.65%

10

 

62

Mitre

 

10

12.1

73.206

2.31%

7

 

62

Kukri

 

10.9

12.5

76.408

1.07%

24

1

62


Copyright © SEPWA 2004    All Rights Reserved